A classic plot-twist has unfolded as
agencies probing the NSEL case have tightened the grip around defaulters. Investigators
have realised that NSEL brokers indulged in routing of black money by their
sister concerns as well as associates.
The case which came to light in 2013 is
being seen as an example of multiple agencies uniting to provide justice – SEBI
(Securities and Exchange Board of India) and a high-level committee set up by
the Bombay High Court are investigating from their respective fronts.
The committee has summoned a new investigation
direction to track the source of funds of the brokers and traders; and
suspicions are strong that they were sister concerns or associates of the very
same brokers.
It was already revealed that glaring
discrepancies have been found in the data and details submitted by the traders.
Submission of wrong PANs (Permanent Account Number) has raised suspicions about
the source of funds. Besides, authorisation letters and trade execution
documents submitted by brokers are also questionable.
A senior regulatory official has aptly
described the case as very unique because here – brokers themselves appear to
be the real investors. Brokers nearly committed every fiscal crime
in the rulebook when they created fake ledger accounts in the name of their
clients, that too without client knowledge or permission.
At least eight brokers and their trading
clients are under the scanner of regulators, probe agencies and the High Court
Committee, who will extensively audit the account books, bank accounts and
income tax returns of traders. Account books of the brokers and those of NSEL
will also be audited.
That’s not all; complaints against the
brokers extend as far as giving false assurances, trading without permission
from clients, misuse of client code and non-receipt of payouts by clients.
"It has also been alleged that funds
of sister concerns of brokers, which could have been derived from illegal
sources, were used to trade on the NSEL platform with an intent to legitimise
the said funds, which amounts to money laundering," a senior official
said.
More than two years have passed without
proper action against the perpetrators and instead inferior alternatives have
been suggested like – merging of NSEL with its parent company FTIL founded byJignesh Shah, a suggestion that goes entirely against the concept of limited
liability.
But now with SEBI and the High Court
committee fully dedicated to dig out the truth, there’s finally hope for the
63k FTIL shareholders who are being made to pay for someone else’s sins.
No comments:
Post a Comment